Rules    FAQ
User: Guest ( Register )
 
 
 

It is currently Fri Oct 04, 2024 5:25 am (All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ])




Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 22 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Interesting Joe Vehicle Origins
PostPosted: Mon Jan 26, 2015 1:33 pm 
User avatar
RPG Spin Master
RPG Spin Master

Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2007 10:19 am
Location: Security. Status. Escape.
Post real life pics of the vehicles that may have inspired the Joe Vehicles we know and love.

Image

The Conquest X30 seems to have been based on the Experimental Russian SU-47.

Your turn.

_________________


Top
 Profile Customs Feedback / Brawlingness  
 
 Post subject: Re: Monday: Interesting Joe Vehicle Origins
PostPosted: Mon Jan 26, 2015 1:43 pm 
User avatar
DarkJedi'd

Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2007 10:19 am
Location: The Black Hole of Toydom
raptor wrote:
Post real life pics of the vehicles that may have inspired the Joe Vehicles we know and love.

Image

The Conquest X30 seems to have been based on the Experimental Russian SU-47.

Your turn.


I was under the impression it was based on the X-29...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grumman_X-29

_________________
Hero Machine Real Characters: https://tinyurl.com/yyguul9e
Hero Machine Original Characters: https://tinyurl.com/y59j5gmd
Hero Machine Other properties: https://tinyurl.com/y48nnp8u


Top
 Profile Customs Feedback / Brawlingness  
 
 Post subject: Re: Monday: Interesting Joe Vehicle Origins
PostPosted: Mon Jan 26, 2015 1:48 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2011 10:42 am
Location: Westminster, MD
I think the Conquest might predate the Russian SU-47, in which case they copied the Conquest!

_________________
BLUE LASERS
PURPLE LASERS
Green Laser Sympathizer

Dusty79 wrote:
I can't wait to cut those babies up for parts.


Top
 Profile Customs Feedback / Brawlingness  
 
 Post subject: Re: Monday: Interesting Joe Vehicle Origins
PostPosted: Mon Jan 26, 2015 1:48 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2007 10:19 am
Location: Kirkland, WA
I've always been curious as to what the advantage of the reversed wing angles is in aircraft design...

Looks like the Conquest takes some elements of both of these, though the name is a pretty obvious connection to the X-29.

_________________


Top
 Profile Customs Feedback / Brawlingness  
 
 Post subject: Re: Monday: Interesting Joe Vehicle Origins
PostPosted: Mon Jan 26, 2015 1:53 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2011 10:42 am
Location: Westminster, MD
I think forward swept wings are about maneuverability, but I'm no aerospace engineer so I may be wrong

_________________
BLUE LASERS
PURPLE LASERS
Green Laser Sympathizer

Dusty79 wrote:
I can't wait to cut those babies up for parts.


Top
 Profile Customs Feedback / Brawlingness  
 
 Post subject: Re: Monday: Interesting Joe Vehicle Origins
PostPosted: Mon Jan 26, 2015 3:00 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2007 10:19 am
Location: NJ
DarkJedi wrote:
raptor wrote:
Post real life pics of the vehicles that may have inspired the Joe Vehicles we know and love.

Image

The Conquest X30 seems to have been based on the Experimental Russian SU-47.

Your turn.


I was under the impression it was based on the X-29...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grumman_X-29



DJ is right. I remember reading a reference that the X30 is based on the X29. This was a few years before the SU-47 was developed which primarily copied the X29 concept.

Both airframes look cool though.

_________________


Top
 Profile Customs Feedback / Brawlingness  
 
 Post subject: Re: Monday: Interesting Joe Vehicle Origins
PostPosted: Mon Jan 26, 2015 3:33 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2007 10:19 am
Dusty79 wrote:
I think forward swept wings are about maneuverability, but I'm no aerospace engineer so I may be wrong


One of the many hats I have worn is that of Aerospace Engineer, and I have a bit of experience in Flight Controls with the topic of forward swept wings having come up in some of the seminars I've sat in on.

I won't bore you with the math, but basically forward swept wings provide exponentially more lift than their rear swept traditional counterparts. This provides a significantly steeper angle of attack for a fighter, providing the forward-swept wing style a significant advantage over a traditional fighter. The downside is that there is a significant amount of increased stress placed on the structural integrity of the wings, requiring a thicker wing, which in turn reduces the aircraft's critical mach number. To put it more simply, a forward swept fighter can get a tactical advantage by getting higher, but the traditional craft can fly so much faster that the advantage is not worth it.

However, this all changed when the X-29 was outfitted with wings made of space age composites. This provided a bit of "give" to the wings so they could be thinner and still stand up to the increased stress of the greater lift provided by the forward swept design. It was so successful that I once heard Dr. Jan Roskam (Flight Controls Guru) state that the forward-swept wing design was magic.

However, none of this data was compiled in time to significantly influence the fifth generation fighters' design.

_________________
I don't care how badly I have been defeated. I declare victory nonetheless.


Top
 Profile Customs Feedback / Brawlingness  
 
 Post subject: Re: Monday: Interesting Joe Vehicle Origins
PostPosted: Mon Jan 26, 2015 3:41 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2007 10:19 am
Location: Kirkland, WA
Wowboy wrote:
Dusty79 wrote:
I think forward swept wings are about maneuverability, but I'm no aerospace engineer so I may be wrong


One of the many hats I have worn is that of Aerospace Engineer, and I have a bit of experience in Flight Controls with the topic of forward swept wings having come up in some of the seminars I've sat in on.

I won't bore you with the math, but basically forward swept wings provide exponentially more lift than their rear swept traditional counterparts. This provides a significantly steeper angle of attack for a fighter, providing the forward-swept wing style a significant advantage over a traditional fighter. The downside is that there is a significant amount of increased stress placed on the structural integrity of the wings, requiring a thicker wing, which in turn reduces the aircraft's critical mach number. To put it more simply, a forward swept fighter can get a tactical advantage by getting higher, but the traditional craft can fly so much faster that the advantage is not worth it.

However, this all changed when the X-29 was outfitted with wings made of space age composites. This provided a bit of "give" to the wings so they could be thinner and still stand up to the increased stress of the greater lift provided by the forward swept design. It was so successful that I once heard Dr. Jan Roskam (Flight Controls Guru) state that the forward-swept wing design was magic.

However, none of this data was compiled in time to significantly influence the fifth generation fighters' design.


Great explanation, really helpful. Is it possible future generations of fighters (or drones) will return to this concept?

_________________


Top
 Profile Customs Feedback / Brawlingness  
 
 Post subject: Re: Monday: Interesting Joe Vehicle Origins
PostPosted: Mon Jan 26, 2015 3:54 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2007 10:19 am
DanOfTheDead wrote:
Great explanation, really helpful. Is it possible future generations of fighters (or drones) will return to this concept?


It is possible, but keep in mind that pure dogfighters are starting to go the way of the dodo. The forces are evolving to demand more multirole aircraft that can be built more cheaply. This is the reason why the Air Force ordered more F-35s than F-22s.

_________________
I don't care how badly I have been defeated. I declare victory nonetheless.


Top
 Profile Customs Feedback / Brawlingness  
 
 Post subject: Re: Monday: Interesting Joe Vehicle Origins
PostPosted: Mon Jan 26, 2015 4:29 pm 
User avatar
RPG Spin Master
RPG Spin Master

Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2007 10:19 am
Location: Security. Status. Escape.
Wowboy wrote:
DanOfTheDead wrote:
Great explanation, really helpful. Is it possible future generations of fighters (or drones) will return to this concept?


It is possible, but keep in mind that pure dogfighters are starting to go the way of the dodo. The forces are evolving to demand more multirole aircraft that can be built more cheaply. This is the reason why the Air Force ordered more F-35s than F-22s.


Approach Horizon. Shoot missile. Software battles software. Go home and drink a beer.

Assuming that you even left home in the first place...

- R

_________________


Top
 Profile Customs Feedback / Brawlingness  
 
 Post subject: Re: Monday: Interesting Joe Vehicle Origins
PostPosted: Mon Jan 26, 2015 5:06 pm 
User avatar
HATES Mattel

Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2007 10:19 am
I recall an article from the 80s that said having one forward and one rearward wing gave the plane maximum possible maneuverability. Something about chaotic airflow always putting the plane on the verge of stalling, or something. Forgive my memory, but that article was many years and beers ago.

_________________


Top
 Profile Customs Feedback / Brawlingness  
 
 Post subject: Re: Monday: Interesting Joe Vehicle Origins
PostPosted: Mon Jan 26, 2015 7:39 pm 
User avatar
Moderator
Moderator

Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2007 10:19 am
Location: Pants
That x-29 looks more like a Condor to me.

_________________
Joe Customs wrote:
"Lance Sputnik you are both insane and brilliant!" (meandnooneelse)
"I want a Lance Sputnik range of figures." (Kambei)
"i love you, Lance Sputnik." (Joemichales70)

:lacespudneck: :mindbender:


Top
 Profile Customs Feedback / Brawlingness  
 
 Post subject: Re: Monday: Interesting Joe Vehicle Origins
PostPosted: Mon Jan 26, 2015 9:53 pm 
User avatar
Formerly Suburbanator

Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 1:21 am
Location: The PacNW
There was a German plane from the 80s similar to a Gulfstream that had forward swept wings. Obviously not a fighter, but I think it's advantage was the greater lift with smaller wings. Obviously it never caught on since planes still have traditional type wings.
That Bercut is just one evil looking plane. I remember watching a documentary about the future of fighter aircraft and it had a few scenarios. One was a B-1 Lancer on a bombing run, and a few MiG-29 came by to harass it. A flight of F-22s came in and shot down the MiG-29s before they could even see the planes. The F-22s escorted the Lancer and suddenly one was shot down and the had no idea where it came from. Some of those Sukois were loitering around and got the drop on the F-22s. They're not stealth like the F-22s, but they're still sneaky as heck.

_________________
Some people, when trying to avoid thinking about those things that cause them pain, turn to drink, food, or drugs...I turn not to any of those...I collect action figures. Over the years, I've found that alcoholism is much more socially acceptable by far.


Top
 Profile Customs Feedback / Brawlingness  
 
 Post subject: Re: Monday: Interesting Joe Vehicle Origins
PostPosted: Mon Jan 26, 2015 10:52 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2009 4:24 pm
Location: Marysville, Ca
The one that always makes me shake my head is the thunder clap. It's based off the m65 atomic cannon aka "Atomic Annie"

http://youtu.be/P2RO6lo84Hc

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/M65_Atomic_Cannon

_________________
Gaigaan-Dnok wrote:
"When a woman is not as much fun as a 90's Toy Biz X-Men figure, you don't marry her."


TFK
My current wants: http://www.joecustoms.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=21&t=22017

My Stuff for trade: http://s611.photobucket.com/tradestuff


Top
 Profile Customs Feedback / Brawlingness  
 
 Post subject: Re: Monday: Interesting Joe Vehicle Origins
PostPosted: Mon Jan 26, 2015 11:35 pm 

Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2007 10:19 am
Everyone knows it but in case someone isnt aware the Vamp was made from the Lamborghini Cheetah.
http://www.lambocars.com/images/off_roa ... tah11.html


Top
 Profile Customs Feedback / Brawlingness  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 22 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

It is currently Fri Oct 04, 2024 5:25 am (All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ])


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group