Pyre wrote:
You can't pull a line out of another thread without leaving the context. I've never claimed to know everything but I know enough and what I do know I've heard from reliable people and like I've said before, it surprises me that you all don't know all this yourselves. Most other places I go, this is all common knowledge. But I guess some people are just so dependent on their hate-boner for Hasbro that they just ignore whatever legitimate info they're given.
I don't see how the phrase "I really don't know the ins and outs of action figure production" requires much context, but here you go:
Pyre wrote:
Distribution is a problem from the retail end of it. There's not much Hasbro can do about it.
Hasbro doesn't make decisions "just because". There are reasons for them and you'll notice that the reasons that we are given are coming from people working on the brand who DO care about it, as well as people who have dealt with Hasbro, not someone in a suit who only cares about the bottom line. Considering I really don't know the ins and outs of action figure production, nor does anyone else here, I'm willing to take those reasons at face value instead of making up a reason because I don't like it or even blaming them for something that they don't control. I don't know why other figures may cost less than Hasbro's. I don't collect much else outside of GI Joe or Transformers so I don't worry about what other companies are doing.
According to this site, the average wage of a manufacturing employee in 2002 was 57 cents/hour US. 5 years later in 2007 that wage was $1.06/hour. The following year it went up 30 cents. According to an article on this site that wage has gone up to $2.50/hour. So in five years the average wage went up almost 150%. So yes, it's pretty easy to believe that manufacturing costs have doubled in 5 years.
And the context is still "I don't actually know any more about toy production than any of you." We're all seeing the same information, and yet you present your interpretation of that information as unassailable truth. Even that would be less objectionable if you didn't attempt to bolster your arguments by painting everyone who disputes or even questions that interpretation as braying morons who willfully ignore the wisdom that you're bestowing upon us. That's getting pretty old. However, I've got a solution that's equitable for everyone: you mention that the members of other boards you frequent already know or agree with what you're peddling; since the people on those boards are clearly more willing to embrace your arguments on that subject, maybe they would be a better audience for such things, and us idiots over here could just persist in our foolish beliefs.