Rules    FAQ
User: Guest ( Register )
 
 
 

It is currently Fri Feb 07, 2025 11:40 am (All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ])




Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 38 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Why are Joes less exclusive?
PostPosted: Thu May 29, 2008 3:20 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2007 10:19 am
EDIT: -- I can't believe I almost got roped into a long-winded rant about "Collecting" versus "Playing with Toys".

In a nutshell: I play with toys - I buy only what I like, and the "serious collector" has no impact on my enjoyment of the hobby because they usually buy things that are of no interest to me (exclusives, MOCs, rare expensive pieces, foreign repaints, etc.) I don't pay more than $10-15 for a figure (including shipping if it's online), so I never cross paths with the types who drop $100 on a Joe without a second thought.

I don't see the need to attack someone else's collecting methods or violently defend your own because I quite frankly don't give a "LASER BLAST" about how everyone else enjoys the hobby, just that they enjoy it. That's what brings us together here - our common enjoyment of GI Joe, no matter how we approach it. Bickering and dividing ourselves into different "classes" is petty, unnecessary, and really makes people look like a-holes, IMO. It sucks the fun right out of the board and never leads to anything productive. And a few of you, both "Elite" and "Common Man" alike need to chill the "LASER BLAST" out and proofread your posts before you submit them - because you can easily come across as douchebags when you get emotional. Emotional about toys.

_________________


Top
 Profile Customs Feedback / Brawlingness  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why are Joes less exclusive?
PostPosted: Thu May 29, 2008 3:58 pm 
User avatar
Larry's Rent Boy
Larry's Rent Boy

Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2007 10:19 am
Location: Greater New Orleans Area
RedClaw wrote:


I also do not know why collector A feels the need to constantly remind collector B how the hobby isn't about money and they just like to be big shots - y'know what I call that? Petty sophomoric jealousy.

</rant>


It's the exact freaking opposite. Even your post is condescending towards those who don't hold the same opinion of you and Mike. You guys only pipe up long enough to put everyone else down, claim to be insulted, and then go back to lurk mode.

I listed six types of collectors, but what did Mike and RedClaw do? You guys both went back to painting an "Us vs. Them" picture! Why!?

Is it because you need that direct opposition to defend your misbelief that you have a greater appreciation for the HOBBY than everyone else? Because you think your affinity for rare items and prototypes needs to be recognized, either by the fandom or some upper echelon?

You know how the guy trying to get sex doesn't get any? The guy trying to look cool doesn't? You know how when you put yourself out there for a complement you're begging to get put down - but when you act like a normal humble person people respect you?

I want to like you guys. I like what you contribute to the hobby, but you guys are instigating this and as much as you want to believe its every one else that has the problem - it's not. Your remarks are condescending.

The "common" hobbyist has no less appreciation for the GI Joe mythos, they just don't have a need for expensive rare items which do not reflect the nostalgic appeal of the original toyline they loved. A repro 86 Viper reflects everything they love about GI Joe and that's what they rightfully desire. They aren't members of the smithsonian, as you are trying to be, they are the modern equivalent of the Lionel Train hobbyist.

I never knew Cobra De Aco and I never need to, but I know my favorite parts of the GI Joe mythos and I have discussed them all ad nauseum with Larry Hama. I know the origin of most of the original 100 or so charcaters - I know that Lady Jaye's real name is that of the Hasbro ad agency president's wife, whom Covergirl's bio is based on. Didn't cost me a $1000 prototype to learn that. So who has greater appreciation for the hobby? Maybe we're both legitimate fans we're just different, that's all.

I wrote a response to Mike's post as well, but didn't post it earlier because I didn't want to stir the pot, but here it is:


1. I can’t wait to have this discussion over dinner at the con. It makes my day to rile you up.

2. You bother because you are trying to convince yourself – your hobby isn’t what you think it is and that eats at you. It is the equivalent of Happy Meal toys Mike, it’s the exact fscking thing as collecting Happy Meal toys and it will never be anything greater no matter how much you have invested in your Joe-Meal toys. These are not depression era tin-toys, they are not “rocket era” wind-up robots, they are not clay soldiers dug up from a roman villages they are relatively recently produced toys that my friends kids still play with as hand me downs. Some day they will be antiques and your collections will be heralded - but today its Happy Meal all the way.

3. Your opening statement is that “money has nothing to do with it” and your supporting paragraphs that follow are all about money. Face it dude, it's about the money. Everything in life is.

4. Why would hobbyists vote for more of the same? Because it’s good! It’s what they like. More McDonalds fries – not different flavors of McDonalds fries! Because McDonalds fries are already the best. I’ll take a million 1986 Viper look-a-likes before getting an ‘87 movie version cold climate Viper because I fit under the persona of the Category 1B hobbyist in my previous list. I want to relive Christmas 1986 forever. Cold climate viper has no nostalgic connection to me and as nice as it would be it wouldn’t fit under the mission of my hobby – troop building nostalgia.

5. I see your third ($4) paragraph differently. Look at the seller’s perspective. It’s not that hobbyists refuse to spend the $4, it’s that if a figure is going for more on eBay than the demand must be there so it’s a safe investment to reproduce it. And going back to my earlier post, a 1A or 1B Hobbyist will be happy to buy the cheapest available because they’re not looking to build a “collection” they’re looking to build a play set. Best price is most logical. They aren't cheap, perhaps they are practical. They choose to spend their money elsewhere - that's their perogative.

6. It’s simply a difference of perspective. You always leave your customer wanting more – Hasbro and MC have done a good job of that. You feel like they are focusing on producing items you don’t see a need in because they don’t interest you personally but in actuality, they’ve done a great job of teasing every collector’s style – rehashed ARAH, repro internationals, troop builders, chase figures/exclusives, etc. There is no push to reproduce every rare and un-produced figure right away – because they don’t care to exhaust their options. The Cartoon fans feel like they aren’t getting enough, the comic book collectors feel like they aren’t getting enough. It’s all part of successful marketing – we’re all hungry at the troughs.

7. Mike it’s not a conspiracy theory about high end collectors, every few months you or one of your allies make snobby asides about how everyone who’s enjoying themselves with the hobby is ruining your collecting experience. No one seeked you out in this thread and knocked your affinity for rare figures - you started putting down the "common" collector and then started crying foul once the "commoners" responded!

_________________
WANTED: Just the Boxes!
    1982/83 VAMP Box
    1983 Whirlwind Box
    1984 Machine Gun Defense Unit Box
    1985 Air Defense Box
    1985 Cobra Rifle Range Box


Birkenstocks 50% Off! http://shop.ebay.com/youx30/m.html?_nkw ... m=&_ipg=25


Top
 Profile Customs Feedback / Brawlingness  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why are Joes less exclusive?
PostPosted: Thu May 29, 2008 4:14 pm 
User avatar
Baron Shooty Von Shooterwelm
Baron Shooty Von Shooterwelm

Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2007 10:19 am
CJ I'll simply leave one last thought and go back into my exile in lurking - I have my opinions, and you have yours and everyone else each to their own.

My only point I care for anyone to remember is that the hostility is pointless and it's petty. People want to get fired up about it, they want to lambaste everyone who holds a different opinion, that's fine too.

To me, at this point, I've said my piece and anything further from me is a waste of bandwidth and data storage.


Top
 Profile Customs Feedback / Brawlingness  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why are Joes less exclusive?
PostPosted: Thu May 29, 2008 4:19 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2007 1:51 pm
Location: Red Stick, LA
pluv wrote:
Are there enough Transformer exclusives to make a fair comparison. Every Joe Con set is 15 figures (with army builders though) plus additional figures only available there. MC has been running the Jeo Con for what 7 years now? Where as the TF exclusives are usually what like 6 total with a few more added this year and they've only been doing it for a couple of years. I don't know TF well enough to make the comparison but I know there is that one Japanese store exclusive seeker jet that was also made for one of the Cons. It does happen.

Not to derail the thread, but:

BotCon has been going since 1994

1994 - Breakdown
1995 - Night Racer
1996 - Onyx Primal
1997 - Packrat, Fractyl
1998 - Antagony, Vice Grip
1999 - Sandstorm, Wind Razor
2000 - Apelinq, Shockaract
2001 - Arcee, Tigatron
2002 - CatSCAN, Cyclonus, Glyph, Tap-Out
2003 - Sunstreaker*, Sideswipe, Roulette*, Shadow Striker*
2004 - Megazarak, Sentinal Maximus
2005 - Deathsaurus*, Buzzclaw, Dirge, Fallback, Ironhide*, Ricochet, Chromia*, Flareup, Ratchet*, Virulent Clones (x2), Flamewar, Ramjet
2006 - Optimus Primal*, Rattrap, Dinobot*, Cheetor, Rhinox, Megatron*, Waspinator, Unit 2 (Tigatron), Buzzsaw, Laserbeak,
2007 - Bugbite, Dirge, Thrust*, Thundercracker, Dreadwind*, Mirage, Alpha Trion*, Weirdwolf, Springer, Huffer
2008 - Optimus Prime, Goldbug*, Grimlock, Jazz*, Starscream, Razorclaw

That's 60+.

*Redeco/retool

_________________


Top
 Profile Customs Feedback / Brawlingness  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why are Joes less exclusive?
PostPosted: Thu May 29, 2008 4:30 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2007 10:19 am
cabanajack wrote:
words - lots of words


Not to drag this out more - but thanks for that post, CJack - I think you captured the opinions of a lot of us. And now, the waiting for the hammer to come down ;)

_________________


Top
 Profile Customs Feedback / Brawlingness  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why are Joes less exclusive?
PostPosted: Thu May 29, 2008 4:35 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2007 10:19 am
Location: Neon KY
:poopstorm:


Top
 Profile Customs Feedback / Brawlingness  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why are Joes less exclusive?
PostPosted: Thu May 29, 2008 5:27 pm 
User avatar
Larry's Rent Boy
Larry's Rent Boy

Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2007 10:19 am
Location: Greater New Orleans Area
This was meant as a PM but it better expresses my opinion than my last post so I'll post it here too:


I didn't ask anyone else to decide whether or not I am a true collector and I didn't try to define anyone else as less of a collector than I. This was brought on by the same people who now claim to be victims of attack.

Either you really are an uppity pompous butthole (which I don't believe) or you just don't recognize how you're coming across. Humility goes a long way.

I'm glad you "high-end" collectors and your compatriots are collecting and archiving the history of GI Joe. You are making a great contribution to the hobby. But when you announce that it makes you true collectors above everyone else you're alienating yourself and insulting the rest of us.

I'm glad you're collecting the history of GI Joe but I didn't ask you to do it - you don't need recognition from me - it's how you've chosen to entertain yourself and spend your money - it's your hobby. Adversly, I don't need you defining my hobby. I didn't ask you to measure the definition of a true collector - I've chosen the collection style I prefer - and for you to stick your nose in and say "well I'm a real collector and CJack is just a toy fan who likes to call himself a collector" is an unwelcome snub.

I never stuck my nose into your business. I don't feel the need to try to define my hobby in comparison to yours - it is what it is.

Look at the condescending wording of RedClaw's post,

Quote:
collector A likes to call themselves collector B because it legtimizes, socially, their hobby. So collector A can often be scornful and rather militant about collector B, who just wants to do their thing and be left alone



Collector B is busy alienating themselves which can only invite resentment. You don't get respect by belittling everyone telling them they are less of a collector than you. And insinuating that by calling ourselves collectors we are trying to put on aires to look like you . I am a collector in my sense of the word.

Even if it were factually so - you lose all respect by putting it in peoples faces. Other collectors recognize your accomplishments but you want more than that - you want the term "collector" all to yourself and to knock everyone else down a notch and the rest of the collectors are not going to let that happen.

It's not that the added respect isn't due its that one of the most basic social laws of our society is that it's pompous to demand respect. It's granted to you for your accomplishments. Everyone recognizes your accomplishments within the hobby but every time RedClaw or MikeT start this "us vs them" thing - which they initiate - it just opens them up for ridicule.

How about this, acknowledge everyone else as "collectors" and call yourself "archivists" or something special like that. That way you're still elitist without insulting everyone else.

-David

_________________
WANTED: Just the Boxes!
    1982/83 VAMP Box
    1983 Whirlwind Box
    1984 Machine Gun Defense Unit Box
    1985 Air Defense Box
    1985 Cobra Rifle Range Box


Birkenstocks 50% Off! http://shop.ebay.com/youx30/m.html?_nkw ... m=&_ipg=25


Top
 Profile Customs Feedback / Brawlingness  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why are Joes less exclusive?
PostPosted: Thu May 29, 2008 6:05 pm 
User avatar
Plug
Plug

Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2007 10:19 am
Location: Maryland
Mod Speak: Thanks Stormtrooper53 but your effort to get this topic back on track failed. I'm closing this topic because guys who should know better and actually get along fine 99.9% of time can't think before they type and hit submit. In an effort to preserve some freindships we'll just go ahead and add "type of collector" to the board's taboo topics.

_________________
:hijm70:


Top
 Profile Customs Feedback / Brawlingness  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 38 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

It is currently Fri Feb 07, 2025 11:40 am (All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ])


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 170 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group