J_Man wrote:
>snip< Too many corporations are trying to use that "fuel charge" to raise their prices when they're already making 4 to 6 times the money that was put into the product.
I currently am driving a truck for a liquor distributor, and I can attest to the fact that fuel really is taking a massive chunk out of overhead for businesses. Driving the same route, with essentially the same amount of product, cost my house about $95 in fuel a day this time last year. I fueled up yesterday and the reciept was for $172.50, and yesterday was my shortest route of the week. This is for the skunkiest contract fleet service diesel, that's such poor quality it is forever clogging our fuel filters. Nearly twice the cost in fuel daily in one year, with negligible growth to offset it, and that's just ONE truck out of fifteen. That has translated out to roughly 2 to 5 dollars a bottle price increase to make the same amount. Furthermore, as it is, my house was the only one in the southeast quarter of the US to make a substantive profit last year, because we aren't a union shop. Our dividend subsidized the two warehouses south of us that are twice our size. Boys and girls, when LIQUOR doesn't make money, things are bad. The "Fuel Charge" isn't always the straw man people expect it to be.
I also expect that It's costing Hasbro more to make toys, as plastics are sure to have increased. being petro chemical based.