Rules    FAQ
User: Guest ( Register )
 
 
 

It is currently Tue Dec 03, 2024 6:42 pm (All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ])




Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 113 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: GI JOE CONVENTION HINT THE RED SHADOWS
PostPosted: Fri Mar 20, 2009 3:10 pm 
User avatar
Snake Staked

Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2007 10:19 am
Location: Melrose, Massachusetts
well.. they did mention that they would start Mixing parts between RAH and New Sculpts (as we've seen in the Atlanta and Frisco sets)

_________________
He who will not reason is a bigot; he who cannot is a fool; and he who dares not is a slave.
- Sir William Drummond
"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought, without accepting it.
- Aristotle."


Top
 Profile Customs Feedback / Brawlingness  
 
 Post subject: Re: GI JOE CONVENTION HINT THE RED SHADOWS
PostPosted: Fri Mar 20, 2009 4:22 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2007 10:19 am
Location: Pottsville, Pa
From a technical stand point, wouldn't all those new heads in the comic packs constitute new sculpt? I mean they're on RAH bodies, but they're brand new heads from the "New Sculpt" era. Couldn't that be what they're talking about when they say possible new sculpt use?

_________________
You might be a customizer if you have more figures disassembled than assembled.
(sums up my life perfectly)


Top
 Profile Customs Feedback / Brawlingness  
 
 Post subject: Re: GI JOE CONVENTION HINT THE RED SHADOWS
PostPosted: Sat Mar 21, 2009 4:50 pm 

Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2008 5:54 pm
All I know is if the set is what I think it is, I will buy the crap out of them!


Top
 Profile Customs Feedback / Brawlingness  
 
 Post subject: Re: GI JOE CONVENTION HINT THE RED SHADOWS
PostPosted: Sun Mar 22, 2009 2:55 am 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2007 10:19 am
I think our terminology is making the point confusing. For a long time "new sculpt" referred to the figures with plastic rivets (shoulders, elbows), the occasionally added articulation, and in some cases, the dreaded T-crotch rather than an o-ring. From 02-06, those were "new." But now they aren't new and to call them "new sculpts" gets confusing.

While the comic pack heads are definitely not from the 82-94 era, they are meant to fit with the 82-94 style of construction. Horror Show stands as the prime example since he is made up of parts that were mostly new when he was released. Yet, he is a figure with 82-94 style construction.

The club has used some new sculpt parts in their figures, but the basic construction has always been the same with good old fashioned o-rings and metal rivets. I actually like the use of some new heads here and there when they pick ones that blend well with the old style. As Justin pointed out, they have stated that this is the format of choice. I don't think we need to be worried that they will start doing anything else any time soon.

I think as a community, it would be nice if we had some terminology that kept us from being confused. A lot of people have strayed away from saying "25th sculpt" because the 25th anniversary is over. And I agree that is a good idea. But it seems to be replaced with "Modern Era" or "modern sculpt." Imo, that is a turn for the worse because as time passes, what is "modern" is relative and the phrase will be just as outdated as "new sculpt."

But what else could we call the 3 eras?


Top
 Profile Customs Feedback / Brawlingness  
 
 Post subject: Re: GI JOE CONVENTION HINT THE RED SHADOWS
PostPosted: Sun Mar 22, 2009 3:25 am 
User avatar
Ripe with kibble / Bojack Strobman
Ripe with kibble / Bojack Strobman

Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2007 10:19 am
Location: !!BEYONDER!!
notpicard wrote:
I think our terminology is making the point confusing. ...But what else could we call the 3 eras?


i disagree. i am aware that 'new sculpt' is no longer the "new sculpt", but i think it succinctly defines the era of joes that was put out with that styling. i also think that ARAH or RAH or Classic represents a certain styling as well. Just so, i think that 25th represents a styling that not only is two years old, but also encompasses what's going to be released with the movie figures, at least as far as the 1:18 'expression' is measured.

and even if they don't become the 'official' terms, they are terms that most joe fans either understand, or could readily recognize by an example --

ARAH
NewSculpt
25th

just my opinion -

_________________


Top
 Profile Customs Feedback / Brawlingness  
 
 Post subject: Re: GI JOE CONVENTION HINT THE RED SHADOWS
PostPosted: Sun Mar 22, 2009 9:17 am 
User avatar
Official JoeCustoms.com Canadian

Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2007 10:19 am
notpicard wrote:
Imo, that is a turn for the worse because as time passes, what is "modern" is relative and the phrase will be just as outdated as "new sculpt."


This lack of forward thinking is how we ended up with the postmodern art era.

If we define sculpting style by subheaders, it becomes a bit clearer:

-ARAH
-GvsC
-25th

But more than one line has been called A Real American Hero, the GI Joe versus Cobra era had a lot of different themes, and the 25th anniversary was two years, not to mention the movie figures are going to be in 25th style.

So we could define them by construction:

-Metal rivets
-Plastic rivets
-Integrated rivets

It narrows the entire aesthetic down to a single detail, but at least it is a detail that is universal across all different examples within a single sculpting style.

_________________
Chief wrote:
Scrams is the Black Bolt of Brenden Fraser look-alikes...


Top
 Profile Customs Feedback / Brawlingness  
 
 Post subject: Re: GI JOE CONVENTION HINT THE RED SHADOWS
PostPosted: Sun Mar 22, 2009 10:04 am 
User avatar
Ripe with kibble / Bojack Strobman
Ripe with kibble / Bojack Strobman

Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2007 10:19 am
Location: !!BEYONDER!!
Scramble wrote:
...It narrows the entire aesthetic down to a single detail, but at least it is a detail that is universal across all different examples within a single sculpting style.


you know Scramble, there's something truly poetic in that line.

_________________


Top
 Profile Customs Feedback / Brawlingness  
 
 Post subject: Re: GI JOE CONVENTION HINT THE RED SHADOWS
PostPosted: Sun Mar 22, 2009 10:11 am 

Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2007 6:52 pm
OR we could go by packaging, which would further break down not only the "New Sculpt" Era, but also the 25th and RAH eras (Battle Corps, Star Brigade, etc. that were "new" figures compared to the repaints used for python patrol, tiger force, etc. back in the 80's).

After all, even in the "New Sculpt" era there were 3 different lines each w/ distinct styles. The JvsC for its odd proportions, t-crotches, and SOUND ATTAAAAAAAACK! :) While the Spy Troops line came next and featured improved proportions, snap on spy accessories, gillie (which i really wish they'd still use for 25th line), and into VvsV where it went into a little all over the place as it improved their design, etc. up until the last few waves that led into the DTC days (which, from what we know, was supposed to be the figures/designs used for the rise of the robots/robots revolution lineup).

Even the 25th line has improved (diaper crotches anyone?) as it went on. It could be broken down from the elimination of the silver backs to the cartoon/comics icons in the top right corner.

_________________
Getting rid of some stuff to make space, will be adding more over the next few months. Ok haven't added anything in like a decade or two.

eBay Auctions for GI Joe, Star Wars, Transformers, WWE, DC & Marvel figures


Top
 Profile Customs Feedback / Brawlingness  
 
 Post subject: Re: GI JOE CONVENTION HINT THE RED SHADOWS
PostPosted: Sun Mar 22, 2009 1:03 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2007 10:19 am
Location: Under the JoeCustoms JoeCon Booth
I'm thinking more and more it's an Action Force/Red Shadows set which is perfectly fine with me. They'll be a welcome addition to my collection and a Red Shadow trooper will compliment the Skank Vipers well.

Now if it IS Action Force/Red Shadows, what vehicles will we get?

_________________
I'm pretty sure it's :robocopgun:


Top
 Profile Customs Feedback / Brawlingness  
 
 Post subject: Re: GI JOE CONVENTION HINT THE RED SHADOWS
PostPosted: Sun Mar 22, 2009 1:16 pm 
User avatar
Doctor of Tea-baganomics
Doctor of Tea-baganomics

Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2007 10:19 am
Mysterious Stranger wrote:
I'm thinking more and more it's an Action Force/Red Shadows set which is perfectly fine with me. They'll be a welcome addition to my collection and a Red Shadow trooper will compliment the Skank Vipers well.

Now if it IS Action Force/Red Shadows, what vehicles will we get?


RoboSkull.

_________________
Every time a fan boy cries, a movie makes a million bucks.


Top
 Profile Customs Feedback / Brawlingness  
 
 Post subject: Re: GI JOE CONVENTION HINT THE RED SHADOWS
PostPosted: Sun Mar 22, 2009 1:26 pm 
User avatar
Strong Fat Tongue

Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2007 10:19 am
Location: Cape Town, South Africa
Big_Tex_Wild_Phil wrote:
Mysterious Stranger wrote:
I'm thinking more and more it's an Action Force/Red Shadows set which is perfectly fine with me. They'll be a welcome addition to my collection and a Red Shadow trooper will compliment the Skank Vipers well.

Now if it IS Action Force/Red Shadows, what vehicles will we get?


RoboSkull.


If we did, I would die.

_________________
joemichaels70 wrote:
KILCARR PISSED ME OFF


Top
 Profile Customs Feedback / Brawlingness  
 
 Post subject: Re: GI JOE CONVENTION HINT THE RED SHADOWS
PostPosted: Mon Mar 23, 2009 10:52 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 11:08 pm
Location: Clarksville, TN and Detroit, MI
Big_Tex_Wild_Phil wrote:
Mysterious Stranger wrote:
I'm thinking more and more it's an Action Force/Red Shadows set which is perfectly fine with me. They'll be a welcome addition to my collection and a Red Shadow trooper will compliment the Skank Vipers well.

Now if it IS Action Force/Red Shadows, what vehicles will we get?


RoboSkull.



Dear God, I hope not.

I would not mind an Action Force set at all, and I definitely like a lot of the European vehicles, as I have several in my collection. But I sure do not want to see a RoboSkull in any way, shape, or form.

That would be nearly as bad as a New Sculpt Convention set.

_________________
Stupidity should be painful.

She's gone from suck to blow!


Top
 Profile Customs Feedback / Brawlingness  
 
 Post subject: Re: GI JOE CONVENTION HINT THE RED SHADOWS
PostPosted: Mon Mar 23, 2009 10:56 pm 
User avatar
Cool after molding
Cool after molding

Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2007 10:19 am
Location: Wadsworth OH
joemichaels70 wrote:
Scramble wrote:
...It narrows the entire aesthetic down to a single detail, but at least it is a detail that is universal across all different examples within a single sculpting style.


you know Scramble, there's something truly poetic in that line.


Because I like "smashing the rat while it's on Scrambles head" I will point out that a number of the later Valor Vs Venom figures had the integrated shoulders...Venomous Maximus, bombstrike, Croc Master, and most everybody in the last 2 waves.

_________________
Are you interested in my Custom Castings?

Check out what I'm able to do in the Commission's section.


Top
 Profile Customs Feedback / Brawlingness  
 
 Post subject: Re: GI JOE CONVENTION HINT THE RED SHADOWS
PostPosted: Tue Mar 24, 2009 12:14 am 
User avatar
Ripe with kibble / Bojack Strobman
Ripe with kibble / Bojack Strobman

Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2007 10:19 am
Location: !!BEYONDER!!
it's hard to be poetic with a braniac in the room.

back on topic, has GIJCC stated when they will start rewarding us with photos?


/i should probably go check out the site...

_________________


Top
 Profile Customs Feedback / Brawlingness  
 
 Post subject: Re: GI JOE CONVENTION HINT THE RED SHADOWS
PostPosted: Tue Mar 24, 2009 12:21 am 
User avatar
Snake Staked

Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2007 10:19 am
joemichaels70 wrote:
back on topic, has GIJCC stated when they will start rewarding us with photos?


Yeah.....Aug 17th. :shifty:

Kama

_________________
ZombieGuide wrote:
I can suck it up one night.

DarkJedi wrote:
they had basically assumed every position in the Kamakura... :shifty:


Top
 Profile Customs Feedback / Brawlingness  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 113 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next

It is currently Tue Dec 03, 2024 6:42 pm (All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ])


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 94 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group